Poll: Cost Is Driving Americans Away From Obamacare Plans

Original Source

About half of all uninsured Americans opted against buying Obamacare health insurance plans because the prices are too high, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation Health Tracking poll.

The Kaiser poll was conducted among 1,204 adults across the country.

A look at healthcare.gov. A recent GAO report found that some insurers are covering elective abortions, which raises concerns about taxpayer dollars going toward the procedure, which is against a provision in the Affordable Care Act. (AP/Jon Elswick)

The news also comes as the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reports that 13 million people are likely to purchase Obamacare plans this year, a decrease of about 8 million. Open enrollment for health care ends Jan. 31.

Fines for not buying a plan are increasing in 2016, with the smallest fine at $695, which is up from $325 in 2015, and an average fine of $1,000 per household.

The Department of Health and Human Services did not provide a statement based on the CBO’s findings, but an HHS official told TheBlaze that 11.5 million people have selected plans and that the department estimates some 17.6 million Americans gained coverage through the Affordable Care Act. CBO estimated that 17 million people would gain coverage through 2015.

For Middle-Income Families, Obamacare Costs Are a Catch-22

Original Source

Kathleen McGrory, Times Staff Writer

Sunday, January 17, 2016 8:30pm

Gary Thompson pays $550 a month for a health insurance plan that covers him and his wife.

The monthly bill strains the Tampa couple’s finances. He works in cabinet design and sales. She is a hair stylist. Together, they make about $65,000.

But here’s what really gets him: With the exception of a few basic services, the plan won’t pay any of Thompson’s claims until he has spent at least $6,500 on health care. His wife also has a $6,500 deductible.

“You spend thousands of dollars a year on insurance,” Thompson said, “and you can’t afford to go to the doctor.”

For months, federal health officials have been touting the low premiums available to people who purchase health plans on the Affordable Care Act exchanges. They’ve even singled out the Tampa Bay area, where the rates for standard Obama-care plans dropped an average of 2.4 percent from 2015.

But for some middle-income earners — especially individuals whose salaries hover around $47,080, the upper limit for receiving tax credits to help offset the cost of coverage — the monthly payments are a financial burden. What’s more, many have plans with high deductibles and copays that can make accessing health care virtually impossible.

“There’s a group of people for whom coverage is going to be very expensive relative to what their income is,” said Cynthia Cox, associate director of the program on health reform and private insurance at the non-profit Kaiser Family Foundation. “In some cases, it is so expensive that it is determined to be unaffordable.”

The high costs are troubling some consumers heading into the final weeks of this year’s open enrollment period. Consumers have until Jan. 31 to sign up for coverage that takes effect March 1.

Those who don’t sign up — and don’t have coverage through an employer or a government program such as Medicaid or Medicare — will face a steep penalty: $695 for every uninsured adult in their household or 2.5 percent of household income, whichever amount is greater.

The Affordable Care Act was signed into law in 2010 to ensure low- and middle-income earners had access to reasonably priced health insurance, regardless of their medical history.

In many ways, it accomplished that goal.

Of the 9 million Americans who purchased coverage on the Affordable Care Act exchanges in 2015, about 80 percent qualified for a tax credit to help with their premium.

The “premium tax credits” aren’t the only help that’s available to consumers. Individuals earning $11,770 to $29,425 (or families of four earning $24,250 to $60,625) are eligible for additional discounts on out-of-pocket costs, including deductibles and copayments.

But for middle-income consumers, premiums can cost hundreds of dollars for each member of their household. A paper published in December by the nonprofit Robert Wood Johnson Foundation reported consumers with incomes around the $47,080 cutoff spent nearly 10 percent of their annual earnings on health insurance premiums — a larger share than lower-earning consumers.

In addition to the premiums, most mid-level silver plans require some level of cost sharing from the insured.

In Hillsborough and Pinellas counties, for example, a 40-year-old man who earns $37,500 and has silver-level coverage must spend an average of $5,285 out of pocket before his insurance will help, according to an analysis of plans offered on healthcare.gov.

The average silver plan in both counties caps out-of-pocket spending for that consumer at $6,440.

“I completely understand people who feel like this is a big lift,” said Katherine Hempstead, who directs research on health insurance coverage at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

But Hempstead and other experts point out that most plans on the Affordable Care Act exchanges cover a set of preventative services at no cost, so long as the provider is part of the network.

They also point out that having insurance can prevent unforeseen medical bills from accumulating — and thrusting an individual or family into bankruptcy.

“It’s better to have that safety net than to not have it, because there’s a tremendous financial risk,” said Melanie Hall, director of the nonprofit Family Healthcare Foundation.

Still, some Tampa Bay area consumers are feeling the sting of high prices.

Wally Blackburn, a 60-year-old retired medical administrator from Tampa, recently found out the cheapest coverage for himself, his wife and his 23-year-old daughter would cost $2,100 a month — a “huge chunk” of the family’s monthly income, he said.

He opted to buy an $800-a-month plan for his wife, who may need back surgery later this year.

But Blackburn and his daughter are sticking with the so-called catastrophic plan they had before the Affordable Care Act. The plan, which has a $6,500 deductible and will only cover them in case of serious injury or illness, was grandfathered in under the health law.

“It can be kind of scary to think about what could happen,” Blackburn said. “But the alternative is to pay an outrageous amount of money.”

Gary and Maxine Thompson, who are both 62, debated going without health insurance earlier this year.

They ultimately decided they needed it.
“There’s a good chance we’ll encounter some sort of health care items,” Gary Thompson said.

In the worst case scenario, the couple could end up spending $19,600 before their plan starts paying for their care. They’ve had to make some adjustments in case that happens. Rather than replace his broken car, Gary Thompson is taking Uber to jobs. He and Maxine have put off their retirement, and are also considering selling their house.

“It’s just so frustrating,” he said. “We’re at a point where coverage really isn’t affordable for us.”

Contact Kathleen McGrory at kmcgrory@tampabay.com or (727) 893-8330. Follow @kmcgrory.

Do you qualify for health insurance subsidies?

The Affordable Care Act offers subsidies to help low- and middle-income earners afford the cost of health insurance coverage. The amount varies based on your state, income and household size.

Here’s who qualifies in Florida:

• If your income is below $11,770 (or $24,250 for a family of four): You won’t qualify for savings on an Affordable Care Act plan. You may qualify for Medicaid.

• If your income is between $11,770 and $29,425 (or between $24,250 and $60,625 for a family of four): You may qualify for an Affordable Care Act plan with lower monthly premiums and savings on out-of-pocket costs.

• If your income is between $29,426 and $47,080 (or between $60,626 and $97,000 for a family of four): You may qualify for an Affordable Care Act plan with lower monthly premiums.

• If your income is above $47,080 (or $97,000 for a family of four): You won’t qualify for savings on an Affordable Care Act plan. You can purchase a plan for the full price.

Source: healthcare.gov

ObamaCare Costs Set to Spike for Thousands

Original Source

Peter Sullivan

01/11/16 08:12 PM EST

About 43,000 ObamaCare enrollees are bearing the full cost of their insurance plans after losing the tax credits that are meant to make coverage more affordable.

Those enrollees no longer receive ObamaCare tax credits because they failed to file a tax return for 2014, according to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The number has never before been released.

Losing the tax credit can come with a sticker shock. HHS said in March that the average monthly ObamaCare premium before tax credits was $364, compared to $101 after the tax credit.The precise number of people who are losing federal subsidies is unclear, ­because even family plans are counted as a single applicant. The number also does not include the 12 states and the District of Columbia that operate their own insurance exchanges.

Still, the IRS warned in July that 710,000 households were at risk of losing ObamaCare subsidies because they hadn’t filed a tax return. After the warning letters went out, the number of households that hadn’t filed dropped.

In October, the IRS flagged about 172,000 ­ObamaCare applicants and notified them they were at risk.

HHS told The Hill that by Jan. 1, because some people fixed the problem and some people had dropped coverage altogether, “less than 25 percent” of the 172,000 applicants were enrolled in ObamaCare without tax credits. That translates to around 43,000 enrollees.

People who are enrolled in an insurance plan can become re-eligible for tax credits by filing their 2014 returns.

HHS said it anticipated the tax return problem and worked to prevent it, including with reminders on HealthCare.gov, the federal ObamaCare portal.

“This is an issue that we’re highly sensitive to,” Kevin Counihan, the CEO in charge of the federal marketplace, told reporters last week. “We’ve enhanced our application with new reminders, new pop-ups and other ways to try to assure people what they need to do to make sure that they comply and file the right forms.”

Other people who failed to follow an ObamaCare tax rule are getting something of a pass from the administration this year.

Those people filed their 2014 tax returns but failed to attach a form that compares their tax credits to their income to make sure they received the right amount of tax credit.

The IRS said Friday that about 976,000 households failed to attach the extra form, known as Form 8962, as of the end of October.

A Treasury representative said Monday that the administration is only cutting off tax credits to people who failed to file a tax return at all. The representative said the allowance for failing to file the second form is for this year only.

“We expect that taxpayers will continue to become acclimated to the changes in the tax filing process in future years,” the representative said. “We remain committed to providing information to taxpayers to help them understand and meet their responsibilities under the [Affordable Care Act].”

The IRS’s return process has undergone significant changes under ObamaCare, which linked health insurance and taxes in a way that people are unaccustomed to.

“There’s definitely a lot of learning to be done,” said Elizabeth Hagan, senior policy analyst at Families USA, a liberal healthcare advocacy group that supports ­ObamaCare.  She noted that professional tax preparers “haven’t been used to filing these forms either.”

Republicans opposed to the healthcare law have long criticized it as overly complicated and say the confusion it has created shows the law is unworkable.

Some of the 12 states running their own marketplaces coordinated with the IRS to locate people at risk of losing their subsidies, to varying levels of success.

Connecticut’s marketplace said it found a way to warn people they could lose the ObamaCare credits without violating federal tax privacy rules. Other state-run marketplaces, however, said that they did not know how many people in the state had failed to file returns.

Still, the IRS sent notices to people in all 50 states, and there were several public awareness campaigns about the importance of filing a return.

Colorado’s marketplace said it would check its enrollees against IRS data after the sign-up period ends, on Jan. 31. At that point, anyone who failed to file a 2014 return will lose tax credits.

“We are concerned,” said Luke Clarke, a spokesman for the Colorado marketplace, adding, “The impact on the customer would be big.”

Hagan of Families USA said she hoped that the warnings broke through to people. But she said the notices for some people could have gone to the wrong addresses or email accounts.

“There’re always going to be people who fall through the cracks,” she said.

Obamacare Growing Pains Trigger Rise In Unpaid Hospital Bills

Original Source

The first two years of broader health insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act has been a boon to hospitals, but entering 2016 there could be cause for concern.

The nation’s investor-owned hospital companies began to report slowing hospital admission growth in the third quarter and new reports indicate an increase in unpaid medical bills that could continue into 2016.

Hospital operators including HCA Holdings, Tenet Healthcare and Community Health Systems are poised to take advantage of newly insured patients with subsidized private coverage and benefits from the health law’s expanded Medicaid program. But in some markets, the growth has slowed for various reasons.

“Some companies reported that a higher level of uncompensated care was a headwind to margins in the quarter,” Fitch Ratings said in a report out last week. HCA, for example, saw a 6% growth in uninsured patients in its hospital emergency rooms in the company’s third quarter. On Friday, however, HCA surprised Wall Street by saying it expects to beat fourth-quarter earnings expectations, adding more drama to the uncertain hospital finance picture.

Fitch Ratings had a different take earlier in the week.

“The benefits of the Affordable Care Act for acute care hospitals ramped up in early 2015, and the short operating history under the legislation makes it difficult to tell how much of the uptick in uncompensated care is related to a tapering of its benefits,” Fitch said in its report. “However, concerns regarding commercial viability of the public health insurance exchanges, and stalled progress of the expansion of state Medicaid programs indicate that the benefit may be slow to accelerate in the coming year.”

To be sure, 31 states including the District of Columbia have adoptedthe Medicaid expansion, but many of those remaining are concentrated in the southern half of the U.S. where Tenet, HCA, Community and other for-profit hospitals have most of their hospitals. Most southern states haven’t expanded Medicaid so uninsured rates remain higher in these areas, hurting hospital finances.

In Texas and Florida, long bastions for for-profit hospital ownership, Republican governors aren’t open to expanding Medicaid despite a lobbying blitz by the hospital industry to take advantage of the federal dollars available to increase coverage of poor residents in their states.

But hospitals have intensified their effort to help sign up uninsured Americans to private coverage available on the public exchanges and could see a boost in patient admissions from those admissions.

In Texas, for example, the Texas Hospital Association last week said 1.1 million of the state’s residents have thus far selected a health plan on the federal health insurance marketplace for 2016 coverage. But the association said it still has the entire month of January to beat last year’s enrollment of 1.2 million Texans and is confident it will do that.

“With one month left in open enrollment, Texas is on track to exceed last year’s marketplace enrollment figures,” said Ted Shaw, THA’s president and CEO. “Texas hospitals are thrilled to be a part of this success with our involvement in Insure Health. Insure Texas. The campaign’s messages of availability and affordability are simple but highly effective, and the evidence is in the enrollment data.”

A picture of hospital admissions will become clearer in the next month with Tenet, HCA, Community Health and Universal Health Services report their fourth quarter 2015 earnings and provide earnings forecasts for 2016.

Obamacare Enrollees Face Higher Premiums Next Year

Original Source

Robert King 12/16/15 3:16 PM

Obamacare enrollees will pay more next year, as new data found a

roughly 10 percent increase on all types of marketplace plans.

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation released datasets on average premiums for 2015 and 2016 on Wednesday. The data showed that every tier of Obamacare plans — bronze, silver and gold — raised average premiums by about 10 percent in 2016 from 2015.

Gold plans had the largest increase with 11 percent, while bronze came in with 10 percent and silver with just under 10 percent, the foundation data shows.

Alaska enrollees face the biggest increase in the silver plan with a 35-percent increase in premiums to $643. Silver plans are often the most popular plan option in Obamacare.

Florida fared pretty well, as it experienced an increase of only $3 in silver plan premiums from $294 to $297.

Some states saw their silver plan premiums actually drop, including Mississippi (7 percent) and Indiana (4 percent).

The foundation’s data includes information on deductibles and cost-sharing requirements for primary care such as co-pays.

Households that lack coverage next year will face an average fine of $969, according to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation study.

The data comes as Obamacare is under fire from congressional opponents who complain the law isn’t lowering people’s healthcare costs.

Insurer Cutbacks Squeeze Patients out of High-End Care

Original Source

Thousands are left furious, terrified after PPO plans dropped

December 5, 2015 Updated: December 8, 2015 12:49pm

More than 88,000 people in the Houston area have lost plans from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas for 2016, potentially cutting off some of the most seriously ill from the top-tier medical care the city has built its reputation on.

Last summer, the state’s largest insurance carrier dropped all preferred provider organization plans from both the Affordable Care Act’s federal exchange in Houston and the private individual market.

Now, with only weeks to go before existing plans expire, patients, doctors and hospitals are scrambling to find what care is available under the insurer’s replacement health maintenance organization plans.

“Jody would be dead if she didn’t have her oncologist,” said Steve Schoger of his wife, his voice catching. The Woodlands couple had their plans canceled.

Both have cancer; both are in experimental clinical trials at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center they fear cannot be replicated elsewhere.

They are at turns furious and terrified.

Even if the former PPO plan holders shift to one of BCBS’s HMO plans on the exchange, those with the most complex medical needs still could be forced out of certain types of specialty care and left to find similar lifesaving treatments elsewhere.

PPOs typically offer more latitude in choosing treatment, while less-expensive HMO networks are more restrictive.

M.D. Anderson, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston Methodist and Memorial Hermann – all at the Texas Medical Center – will be out-of-network in BCBS’s HMO exchange offerings for 2016, according to the insurance company. Those with employer-sponsored group plans are not affected.

Dr. Robert Morrow, president of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas’ Houston and Southeast Texas Region, said in a recent interview that the decision to drop 367,000 PPO plans across Texas, even though customers were paying more for them, was driven by economics. He called the plans “unsustainable” after his company lost $400 million by paying out more in claims than it collected in premiums.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas is a division of Health Care Service Corp., which operates in Texas, Illinois, Montana, Oklahoma and New Mexico.

‘The right decision’

“It was a very difficult decision, but it was the right decision,” Morrow said.

M.D. Anderson, ranked first in cancer care in the nation last summer by U.S. News & World Report, is not covered by a single major insurer on the exchange.

Nationally renowned Houston Methodist and Texas Children’s Hospital also are mostly shut out of the federal marketplace by major insurer HMO plans.

Houston Methodist is in-network in Cigna plans only. Patients wanting treatment at Texas Children’s must navigate a maze by signing up for Community Health Choice’s HMO and then selecting Kelsey-Seybold Clinic as their primary provider, hospital officials said. From there, a Kelsey-Seybold physician will determine if a referral to Texas Children’s is warranted.

Hundreds of doctors affiliated with Houston’s marquee hospitals are also now out of network in many 2016 individual HMO plans, hospital officials said. That includes 250 pediatricians who are part of Texas Children’s Pediatrics group.

“You have some of the world’s best medicine in the Texas Medical Center, where people come from all over the world, yet here is this segment of the population in Houston. People who live here can’t access it,” said a clearly frustrated Mick Cantu, an executive vice president at Houston Methodist. “You can stand there, looking up at the building right in front of you, but you can’t get in.”

While acknowledging that most people with routine medical needs will find good doctors and hospitals in the narrower networks, he discards what seems to be the insurance industry’s belief that all care is interchangeable.

He said he finds the changes drastic and puzzling. Many of the patients affected are middle-class, used to having broad coverage and willing to dig deep into their pockets because they do not qualify for a tax subsidy on the exchange or have bought off the exchange entirely.

MORE INFORMATION

United Healthcare mulls full ACA exit

Last month, the nation’s largest insurer, United Healthcare, announced it was considering pulling out of the ACA’s federal and state exchanges entirely in 2017. Company officials projected losses at $425 million for this year, saying its half-million customers were sicker than anticipated and used more health services.

“It’s one thing to say there is a narrowing of networks. It’s another thing to say you can either have a narrow network or nothing,” Cantu said.

‘We’re being punished’

At least 2,700 patients at Methodist have been affected by the loss of PPO plans.

Dianne Duncan is one of them.

“We’re being punished for picking physicians who are the best at what they do,” she said, moving slowly across her Richmond living room, wincing in pain when she thinks no one is looking.

Duncan, 64, and her husband, Mark, 66, are self-employed communications consultants. They bought their PPO plan in late 2013 during the first ACA open-enrollment period, not because they were sick but in case the worst were to happen. Six months later, it did.

In the summer of 2014, within two weeks, he was diagnosed with prostate cancer and she with advanced-stage colorectal cancer. Growing up the daughter of a doctor, she had always been told: “If you have something serious, you go to the Medical Center.”

A flurry of calls led both to highly respected doctors, oncologists and surgeons. Duncan had his surgery at Memorial Hermann in September 2014. His wife had hers two months later at Houston Methodist. Both have been cancer-free for a year butneed follow-up care. Duncan now qualifies for Medicare, but his wife does not.

PROGNOSIS

Neither her doctors nor her hospital will be in-network under the HMO plan their insurer offered them.

“I feel deserted,” she said last week as she waited for the results of a colonoscopy to make sure her cancer has not returned. “What if they find something?”

Her husband feels something closer to rage.

“I think the object in all of this is to go back to the way it used to be, so (insurance companies) can pick and choose who they want to cover,” he said.

Similar concerns

Dan Fontaine, executive vice president of administration at M.D. Anderson, has similar concerns about the disappearance of exchange coverage for Houston’s prestige medical institutions: “Why so fast? Why so complete?”

“The management of risk used to be handled through denials of pre-existing conditions,” he said of pre-ACA days. “It is now being handled through the narrowing of the marketplace.”

Certainly the pre-ACA reality of only getting the widest coverage through group plans is returning, he said.

Last year, 19 PPO plans were offered in the Houston region. When the 2016 federal exchange and private market opened on Nov. 1, there was none. Eliminated plans expire Dec. 31, and enrollees, looking for replacement plans, have been urged to find one by Dec. 15 to ensure uninterrupted coverage.

Cigna offered seven PPO options on the Houston exchange last year but now also has none. A spokeswoman said in an email that no one from the company would be available to discuss the reasons.

It also would not disclose the number of customers in the area affected by the loss of its PPO plans.

Morrow, at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, explained that by law his company sets rates based on all individual members’ claims history, or a single risk pool. If the payouts in one plan are high, it raises the prices of all plans. Since most people buying on the exchange have chosen lower price over broader choice, insurers have jettisoned the more expensive plans – and presumably expensive providers.

Costs harder to control

PPO plans typically cost insurers about 20 percent more than HMO plans because they are less able to control costs in where customers seek treatment. A study by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation last month found that nationally, two-thirds of insurance companies offering PPO plans for 2015 either reduced the number of plans or dropped them completely for 2016.

Morrow said his company does offer one HMO plan that allows some out-of-network choice but conceded it came with a “significant” out-of-pocket price tag.

He rejects the idea that his sickest customers are losing lifesaving care at premier medical institutions.

“This is Houston, Texas. There is very good care in the community,” he said, adding that his company would guide any customer in the midst of complex care to an in-network provider.

Not on his life, Jay Solomon countered, meaning it quite literally.

The Houston psychologist, 63, sat in a corner chair in the beige treatment room at M.D. Anderson, with his left arm outstretched as a tube pumped Carfilzomib, an anti-cancer drug, into his vein. He was diagnosed in 2009 with incurable multiple myeloma, a cancer of the plasma cells that produces tumors in the bones.

In 2012, his condition worsened, and he found treatment at M.D. Anderson, a decision he believes prolonged his life. He now goes for chemotherapy every two weeks, as his doctor continues to try new treatments.

For two years, Solomon had a bronze Blue Cross and Blue Shield PPO plan. He paid $618 a month in 2015 and quickly reached his $6,000 in-network deductible.

To stay at M.D. Anderson and continue with his doctor, he will have to pay out-of-network costs on an HMO plan that could mount to at least $70,000 each year.

For two weeks, he called BCBS customer service, trying to find the right person to look at his case and grant him in-network status since he is in the middle of treatment. Last week, he got the answer: Denied.

He was offered an alternate doctor within the insurer’s network. He has appealed.

“You might be offering me care, but you’re not offering me comparable care. There’s no way I’m not coming here,” he said, his defiance tinged with bitterness.

Countless hours of searching unearthed a little-known option of a small, off-network PPO through Memorial Hermann. Customers must use the hospital’s facilities and doctors or pay out-of-network rates. Solomon said he was willing to pay those rates to stay at M.D. Anderson. He figured between premiums and the $15,000 out-of-pocket cap, he will pay roughly $24,000 a year.

He realizes, though, that he still could be on the hook for any difference between the “allowed amount” for specific treatments and what is billed. That could drive his costs up substantially.

Medical discrimination?

“I thought the ACA was trying to get rid of some of this kind of discrimination,” he said, blaming not the health care law but the insurers he thinks have found a way around it.

Political opponents of what’s known popularly as Obamacare say this is what they warned about all along. Others accuse hospitals and drug companies of price gouging.

A new change.org online petition now with more than 900 signatures takes M.D. Anderson to task, demanding it take patients who have lost individual coverage.

M.D. Anderson officials call the anger misplaced.

“The petition would suggest we at M.D. Anderson refused to accept individual insurance policies and refused to negotiate with insurance companies to be part of their provider network. Neither of those are true,” Fontaine at M.D. Anderson said, adding there is a “consistent pattern” by insurers to offer reimbursement rates much lower than hospital and doctor costs.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield also focused on the hospitals, complaining they will not lower their rates.

“We are willing to talk to providers to get them in our network,” Morrow said. “They made what I can only assume was a business decision to decline.”

M.D. Anderson, Texas Children’s Hospital and Houston Methodist executives all have said they will work with those in active treatment to help them keep continuity of care, although it is not yet clear how.

Randy Steward, director of managed care at Texas Children’s Hospital, insisted his institution “would take care of Texas children.” He also pointed to a Texas Department of Insurance provision that said if a specific service is not covered in-network, the patient would be eligible for coverage by an out-of-network provider.

‘The Scarlet C’

Stuck in the middle are patients.

“I ride my bicycle 6,000 miles a year. I can run circles around the 20- and 30-year-olds. But I got cancer. I’ve got the Scarlet ‘C.’ The PPO says I’m too damn expensive,” said Steve Schoger, a 63-year-old self-employed financial planner.

Jody Schoger, 61, was first diagnosed with breast cancer in 1998. The disease went into remission but came roaring back in 2012 and spread to her lymph nodes, abdomen and stomach.

Steve Schoger was diagnosed with melanoma in 2003. Before his diagnosis, he found an individual PPO policy with Blue Cross and Blue Shield, but his wife, because of her pre-existing cancer, was declined. She eventually found coverage through the now-defunct state high-risk pool.

When the ACA became law, she was able to get an individual PPO plan and clung to it. This year, she paid $916 per month; her husband $941.

His wife walked into the room looking stricken. She had just hung up the phone after pleading for an exception from BCBS so she could continue treatment at M.D. Anderson. It was denied. She was told she could use another oncologist in-network. Her husband shut his eyes tightly and forced a smile.

One day later, he also was denied.

“We’ll find a way,” he told his wife of 40 years. “We have to. Our lives depend on it.”

Granite Staters Speak Out about Obamacare

Original Source

Granite Staters speak out about Obamacare

More than 400 people responded to a New Hampshire Sunday News web survey about personal experiences with Obamacare, with 25 people willing to provide more details as to their situation. Here are a few examples.

Andrew Santom, Litchfield

Before 2014, I had a PPO that cost me $165 (family) per pay period, and all I had was a $25 co-pay, no deductible. Once the ACA rolled out, the same PPO plan jumped to $557 (family) a pay period, with a $25 co-pay, a $2,000 deductible and $5,000 max out of pocket.

For 2016, I switched to a high deductible plan, which is $185 per pay period and has a $5,000 individual and $10,000 family deductible, but covers preventative care 100 percent. I contribute $3,500 a year to an HSA account to help defer costs.

Harrison Brown, Atkinson

As a 60-year-old American, I’ve seen many changes to health care over my career.

In the two years prior to 2016, my wife and I obtained health insurance through Anthem BCBS. We’ve been fortunate enough to be “grandfathered” into the system and therefore our monthly premiums have not gone up as a much as if we were new subscribers.

Granted, there are options that on the onset appear more affordable now. Should we take one of those options, and come back to Anthem BCBS, our rates will be substantially higher than they currently are. We just don’t know what lies ahead because the rules change every year.

I never thought in my lifetime, I’d be shopping for, and managing my health care.

Prior to 2009 my wife had a family plan with SNHU where she was employed. The premiums were affordable and everything was covered. She no longer works at SNHU. We have an individual plan with high premiums and high deductibles.

Rosanne Breault, Merrimack

I applied for coverage through HeathCare.gov. I never actually enrolled. Due to the cost, I chose the penalty and so I am actually uninsured.

For the enrollment year of 2013, my estimated Silver Plan premium would have been about $341 per month. This was an average plan with a co-pay for doctor visits and a deductible of $2,500. For the enrollment year of 2014, my monthly premium was estimated at $393 per month and the deductible was $5,000.

My decision to take the fine rather than the coverage was based on a choice — keeping my car to get to work or medical insurance. I couldn’t have both.

Bruce and Susan Lambert, Nashua

Before Obamacare, our (employer-sponsored) insurance had a $1,500 family deductible. Now it is $3,000.

Costs were covered basically 70/30 on the plan we had, which is roughly the same plan we have now. Our insurance would always cover in some form for whatever the issue was. We always paid the remainder of our obligation. Now insurance will pay nothing towards any claim until we hit the $3,000 deductible.

I’m 53, and I have never seen insurance cost go down … ever.

I told my wife this year I might go check the Obamacare website to see if that was cheaper. I believe I found a similar silver plan, with a slightly lower premium, but the deductible was sky high.

I suppose if you are wealthy, the $3,000 deductible may not mean much, or indigent, when I suppose Obamacare picks up most of the cost. But to the average middle income folks (like us) this is huge.

At my age, I shouldn’t have to worry about seeing the doctor if there is an issue, but I am, as I don’t want to incur substantial expense to my family. You basically have to “set aside” $3,000 to cover any doctor bill, visit or procedure.

While I agree with some components of the ACA, I honestly did not see a problem with the prior system.